Exploring the Quote from “Jektut Chadasz, 171, 3”

an older, wise man studying an ancient book

Email from Emma Goldman:

Dear Rabbi Joshua,
I recently came across a quote that says, “It is forbidden to disclose the secrets of the law. He who would do it would be as guilty as though he destroyed the whole world.” It’s attributed to “Jektut Chadasz, 171, 3.” This statement has left me quite troubled, and I’m wondering if this is really in the Talmud. Could you please help clarify this?
Best,
Emma Goldman

Understanding the Context of “Jektut Chadasz, 171, 3”

Dear Emma,

I appreciate your reaching out to seek clarity on this matter. Let’s delve into the context and authenticity of the quote you mentioned.

About the Source: The reference “Jektut Chadasz, 171, 3” does not correspond to the Talmud or any well-known classic Jewish text. The Talmud, a central text in Rabbinic Judaism, is composed of the Mishnah and Gemara and does not include a section titled “Jektut Chadasz.” It’s possible that this reference could be to a lesser-known or obscure work, but it is not a part of the mainstream Talmudic literature.

The Nature of the Statement: The quote itself, regarding the secrecy of the law, is not a principle found in mainstream Jewish teachings. While there are discussions in Jewish tradition about the careful transmission of certain esoteric or mystical teachings, the foundational texts and laws of Judaism are not considered secret and are openly studied and discussed.

Jewish Tradition on Learning and Sharing Knowledge: In fact, Jewish tradition encourages the study and sharing of Torah and its teachings. The Talmud and other Jewish texts are replete with dialogues, debates, and discussions, emphasizing the importance of learning and transmitting knowledge to others. The ethos of Jewish learning is one of accessibility and communal sharing of wisdom.

Approach to Studying Jewish Texts: When encountering quotes or references to Jewish texts, especially obscure ones, it’s important to consult knowledgeable scholars or reliable sources. Misattributions and misunderstandings can arise, leading to confusion about the teachings and values of Judaism.

In conclusion, Emma, the statement you’ve encountered does not appear in the Talmud or mainstream Jewish texts. Jewish tradition values the sharing and open discussion of its teachings, contrary to the idea of forbidden secrecy suggested in the quote. I hope this clarification brings you some peace and understanding.

With blessings and in the spirit of learning,
Rabbi Joshua

Continue Reading

Kethuboth 11b, Talmud – Explained

Jewish rabbi who is very surprised

Email from Jessica Stein:
Dear Rabbi Joshua,
I am very disturbed by a statement I came across, attributed to Kethuboth 11b, stating, “When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing.” This has caused me great upset, and I am seeking to understand if this is really a teaching from the Talmud.
Yours sincerely,
Jessica Stein

Understanding the True Meaning of Kethuboth 11b

Dear Jessica,

Your distress regarding this statement is completely understandable. It’s crucial to approach such sensitive matters with a deep commitment to accuracy and context, particularly when dealing with ancient texts like the Talmud.

About Kethuboth 11b: Kethuboth 11b is indeed a section of the Talmud. However, the statement you mentioned is a misinterpretation of the Talmudic discussion. The Talmud, in this section, is engaging in a complex legal discussion about the implications of various actions on marriage contracts and the legal status of virginity in the context of Jewish law. It is not, in any way, an endorsement or trivialization of the act described.

Context of Talmudic Discussions: The Talmud is a compilation of rabbinic discussions that delve into Jewish law, ethics, and philosophy. These discussions often involve theoretical scenarios to explore the boundaries of the law. They are not meant to be direct moral or ethical endorsements of the behaviors being discussed.

Jewish Law and Child Protection: It is important to emphasize that Jewish law and ethics unequivocally condemn any form of child abuse, including sexual relations with minors. Such actions are abhorrent and antithetical to the values of Judaism. The protection and welfare of children are paramount in Jewish law and ethics.

Approaching Talmudic Study: Studying the Talmud requires understanding its complex legal reasoning and historical context. It is vital to consult knowledgeable scholars and authoritative sources to accurately interpret these texts. Misinterpretations can lead to misconceptions about the teachings and values of Judaism.

In conclusion, Jessica, the passage in Kethuboth 11b is a legal analysis and does not represent a moral stance or endorsement of the actions described. The Talmud, and Judaism as a whole, upholds the dignity and protection of all individuals, especially children.

With blessings and in the spirit of truth-seeking,
Rabbi Joshua

Continue Reading

Jore Dea 377, 1, Talmud – Explained

a gentile man and a Jew talking in front of a synagogue

Email from Nathan Goldberg:

Dear Rabbi Joshua,
I recently read a statement that has left me quite upset. It claims, “If a Jew has a non-Jewish servant or maid who dies, one should not express sympathy to the Jew. You should tell the Jew: ‘God will replace ‘your loss’, just as if one of his oxen or asses had died’.” This is said to be from Jore Dea 377, 1. Is this really in the Talmud?
Sincerely,
Nathan Goldberg

Clarifying the Context of Jore Dea 377, 1

Dear Nathan,

Your concern about this statement is understandable, and it’s important to seek clarity and truth. Let’s look closely at the source and context of this quote.

About the Source: Jore Dea (Yoreh De’ah) is a section of the Shulchan Aruch, not the Talmud. The Shulchan Aruch is a code of Jewish law compiled in the 16th century by Rabbi Joseph Caro. It covers a wide range of Jewish legal practices, including dietary laws, ritual purity, and ethical guidelines.

Context of Jore Dea 377, 1: The specific section, Yoreh De’ah 377, deals with the laws of mourning and bereavement. However, the statement you mentioned does not accurately represent the content or spirit of Yoreh De’ah 377, 1. Jewish law and ethics emphasize compassion and empathy towards all individuals, regardless of their background or faith. The concept of showing respect and sympathy for the loss of any human life is a fundamental aspect of Jewish teachings.

Jewish Teachings on Compassion: Judaism places a high value on human life and dignity. The idea that a human being could be equated to an animal in their death is contrary to Jewish values. The Talmud and later Jewish writings advocate for kindness and empathy towards all, including non-Jews and servants.

Addressing Misinformation: It’s important to approach such claims critically, especially when they seem to contradict the fundamental principles of Jewish ethics. Misinterpretations or misquotations can lead to misunderstandings of Jewish law and its humanitarian values.

In conclusion, Nathan, the statement you have read is not a reflection of the teachings of Yoreh De’ah 377, 1, or Jewish values more broadly. Jewish tradition teaches respect and sympathy for the loss of all human life. Your pursuit of the truth in this matter is commendable, and I hope this response brings you reassurance and clarity.

With blessings and in pursuit of understanding,
Rabbi Joshua

Continue Reading